Summary: | Does not handle large attachments | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Claws Mail (Windows) | Reporter: | wazz |
Component: | default | Assignee: | users |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | P3 | ||
Version: | 3.13.2 | ||
Hardware: | PC | ||
OS: | Windows 7 |
Description
wazz
2016-08-19 00:15:06 UTC
They've always been handled perfectly well here. Define 'large'. The problems which you describe, are they with one server only? (In reply to comment #1) > They've always been handled perfectly well here. > > Define 'large'. > > The problems which you describe, are they with one server only? I just tried to send a PDF that is only 22KB. Claws hung there for awhile, then gave the "Could not queue message for sending" error. I notice in the bug reports, others have had this problem. This often happens with the PDFs. My solution has been to disconnect from my LAN via a shortcut I have on my desktop, then reconnect. Claws usually sends the PDF out right away after that. Other files Claws hangs on are much larger, databases and exe's I am trying to send my son. It has gotten so problematic that we use Teamviewer to link up and do a file transfer. The hangs occur both for my local server/ISP which is my "main" personal account, but it also occurs when sending email thru my website based addresses, of which I use several. They are all on another server in Texas. Thanks Steve (In reply to comment #2) > I notice in the > bug reports, others have had this problem. which ones? (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > I notice in the > > bug reports, others have had this problem. > > which ones? Bug 2262 ? (In reply to comment #4) > Bug 2262 ? You're using IMAP also? (You didn't say) Is this report a duplicate of bug #2262? (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Bug 2262 ? > > You're using IMAP also? (You didn't say) Is this report a duplicate of bug > #2262? For my several email addresses where I have this problem, all IMAP. I do use local folders to archive. I cannot say if it is a duplicate of 2262. Does appear similar. |