Archive for the 'Culture/Politics' Category

sarkozy wins French election

Monday, May 7th, 2007
French citizens vote for the police state.
President George W Bush has already phoned to say well done.
Thatcher reborn? Let's hope not.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • blogmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

That is not my question…

Wednesday, May 2nd, 2007

Perhaps Jeremy Paxman's only quality is his interview technique, but it's a good one. Here's one such example, from BBC TV's Newsnight, 4th June 2001, which is worthy of recollection. Tony Blair provides the role of the ideal interviewee, stumbling and bumbling through his responses and clumsily confirming New Labour's shift from the traditional Labour egalitarian stance through his tactless avoidance of answering a simple question.
(The full transcript of the interview is available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/events/newsnight/1372220.stm.)


This is Tony Blair

PAXMAN: But is it acceptable for the gap between rich and poor to widen?

BLAIR: It is acceptable for those people on lower incomes to have their incomes raised. It is unacceptable that they are not given the chances. To me, the key thing is not whether the gap between those who, between the person who earns the most in the country and the person that earns the least, whether that gap is…

PAXMAN: So it is acceptable for the gap to widen between rich and poor?

BLAIR: It is not acceptable for poor people not to be given the chances they need in life.

PAXMAN: That is not my question.

BLAIR: I know it's not your question but it's the way I choose to answer it. If you end up going after those people who are the most wealthy in society, what you actually end up doing is in fact not even helping those at the bottom end.

PAXMAN: So the answer to the straight question is it acceptable for the gap between rich and poor to get wider, the answer you are saying is yes.


Life-size mannequin of Tony Blair
that stands at the entrance of
the Sedgefield Sainsburys
supermarket

BLAIR: No, it's not what I am saying. What I am saying is that my task is…

PAXMAN: You are not saying no.

BLAIR: But I don't think that is the issue…

PAXMAN: You may not think it is the issue, but it is the question. Is it OK for the gap to get wider?

BLAIR: It may be the question. The way I choose to answer it is to say the job of government is make sure that those at the bottom get the chances.

PAXMAN: With respect, people see you are asked a straightforward question and they see you not answering it.

BLAIR: Because I choose to answer it in the way that I'm answering it.

PAXMAN: But you are not answering it.

BLAIR: I am answering it. What I am saying is the most important thing is to level up, not level down.

PAXMAN: Is it acceptable for the gap between rich and poor to get bigger?

BLAIR: What I am saying is the issue isn't in fact whether the very richest person ends up becoming richer. The issue is whether the poorest person is given the chance that they don't otherwise have.

PAXMAN: I understand what you are saying. The question is about the gap.

BLAIR: Yes, I know what your question is. I am choosing to answer it in my way rather than yours.

PAXMAN: But you're not answering it.

BLAIR: I am.

PAXMAN: You are answering another question.

BLAIR: I am answering actually in the way that I want to answer it. I tell you why I want to answer it in this way. Because if you end up saying no, actually my task is to stop the person earning a lot of money earning a lot of money, you waste all your time and energy, taking money off the people who are very wealthy when in today's world, they probably would move elsewhere and make their money. What you are not asking me about, which would be a more fruitful line of endeavour, is what are you doing for the poorest people to give them a boost.

PAXMAN: Let's talk about tax. You have promised…

BLAIR: Why don't we talk about the poorest of society and what we are doing for them.

PAXMAN: I assume you want to be Prime Minister. I just want to be an interviewer. Can we stick to that arrangement?

BLAIR: Fine.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • blogmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Pinochet dead, Thatcher saddened

Wednesday, December 13th, 2006

Yes, Margaret Thatcher, the bane of the British people, is reported to be 'greatly saddened' at the news of Pinochet's death, (see the BBC news report).

Some time soon we'll be reading of Thatcher's death – she can't have that many years left in her. But more important and welcome than that will be the death of the Thatcher legacy which is still much in evidence and crippling to the majority of British people.

As they used to say…

Maggie, Maggie, Maggie : OUT! OUT! OUT!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • blogmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

workers of the world: relax

Saturday, December 9th, 2006

An extract from Peter Linebaugh's The London Hanged, Crime and Civil Society in the Eighteenth Century, (2nd edition, Verso 2006)
(For further information, see the entry in the Reading List category)

Colquhoun was the London agent for the planters of St. Vincent, Nevis, Dominica and the Virgin Islands. He worked tirelessly for the West India Merchant's Committee in London. He worked closely with the Home Secretary and the House of Commons, testifying frequently to the Finance Committee on the subject of police and drafting its legislation on that subject. Edmund Burke, Edward Gibbon and Adam Smith were visitors to his home. He collaborated closely with Jeremy Bentham on police schemes and reformations of the dockyards. If a single individual could be said to have been the planner and theorist of class struggle in the metropolis it would be he. Melville Lee called him the 'architect' of the police. The Webbs called him its 'inventor'. His influence goes far beyond the establishment of the Marine Police Office, because his books, although written for the practical purpose of establishing a police force, contain that combination of law, economics, flattery and class hatred that together have exercised a powerful influence upon subsequent conceptions of law and order.

His concept of class relations was at once cosmic and dialectical. London was the greatest manufacturing and commercial city in 'the known world'. Its riches were greater than anything 'in the Universe'. Yet, he stated axiomatically, where riches flow there is an acession of crime. The 'progressive increase of Crimes' is 'the constant and never-failing attendant on the accumulation of Wealth'. 'Commercial Riches and Criminal Offences have grown together.' Property and acts of pillage are logically and necessarily connected. He speaks, not for the West India merchants and planters, but for the 'community', 'the nation', 'humanity', 'the civilised world', 'society', 'the law'. His attitude was Newtonian in its obsession with enumerating the 'flux' of wealth and crime. He measures exports, imports, river traffic, ocean traffic, profits and losses. He seeks to do the same with the working class, whose lodging-houses, street-sellers, horse-dealers, pawnbrokers, stablekeeps, second-hand sellers, hawkers, pedlars, public houses, old-iron shops he wished to count, register and license.

'Police in this country,' he writes, 'may be considered as a new Science; in the PREVENTION and DETECTION OF CRIMES, and in those other functions which relate to INTERNAL REGULATIONS for the well ordering and comfort of Civil Society.' This was the classic conception of 'police' because it combined law and economics, the protection of property and the protection of production. It is the conception that Colquhoun learned from the Scottish élite such as Adam Smith, whose Wealth of Nations first appeared as 'Lectures on Police', or William Robertson, who distinguished feudal from commercial societies by the presence of 'police'. Smith's pupil, Adam Ferguson, had argued in 1792 that 'national felicity' depended on 'labour rightly directed'. That 'Wealth comes from inequality' was the first principle of his 'Moral and Political Science'.

Colquhoun sees the working class as an epidemic: the mass of labourers are 'contaminated', one group of workers 'infect' another. Hence he proposes a police to sanitize class relations. He sees the working class as a military enemy whose 'various detachments and subdivisions … [form] the general army of Delinquents'. 'Opportunities are watched and intelligence procured with a degree of vigilance similar to that which marks the conduct of a skilful General.' The London working class has spun a 'system', a 'monstrous System of Depredation', a 'General System of Pillage'. It is 'disciplined in Acts of Criminal Warfare'. It forms 'conspiricies', it comprises a 'phalanx'. The working class is also uncivilised, possessing 'unruly passions', 'rapacious desires', 'evil propensities', 'noxious qualities', 'vicious and bad habits', and its moral turpitude needs the 'humane improvement' by police.

'Poverty' was necessary to wealth (It is the lot of Man – it is the source of Wealth). 'Indigence' on the other hand is 'the evil'. It is the condition of 'idleness', the root of all problems, producing 'a disposition to moral and criminal offences'. 'Idleness' is both a moral category and an economic one: it is the refusal to accept exploitation. This refusal is measured by the 'losses' of the West India merchants (during a decade of unprecedented profit and trade). The conflation of morality and economics is also found in Colquhoun's taxonomy of depredation, which, in fact, apart from diction, is identical to the riverside division of labour, so watermen became 'night plunderers', coopers became 'light horsemen', lumpers became 'heavy horsemen', porters and gangsmen became 'scuffle hunters', etc. Colquhoun employs a rhetorical strategy that criminalizes the river proletariat. The semantic trick enables his readers both to extol the division of labour and to despise the divided labourers. The rhetorical freedom permitting this sleight of hand is necessary to the double vision of the bourgeoisie, which fears and dreads the working class while simultaneously understanding that labour is 'the foundation of all value'. Dr Johnson noted that the diction of the labouring class as casual and mutable, and he called it 'fugitive cant', thus performing a semantic criminalization. He therefore excluded the diction of labour from his dictionary as 'unworthy of preservation'. Such ignorance was a luxury that could not be afforded by those who need to understand the proletarians, such as police, army captains and engineers. Captain Grose's Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue, whose third edition was published in 1796, does not mention the terms of Colquhoun's approbrium. He was unfamiliar with river work. Colquhoun's semantic strategy was an old one, originating in the first cant dictionaries of the sixteenth century. They divide the working class into a dangerous, incomprehensible, secret underworld, and an honest, plain-spoken, orderly world of labouring dependents. By the 1790s the association between civilisation and correct English implied that speakers of vulgar English were 'savage' – the term Harriott used to describe river workers. Colquhoun added particularity to the generalization.

Colquhoun was not given to making distinctions between 'custom' and 'crime', and where he was forced to acknowledge them his goal was only to abolish the difference.

What was at first considered the wages of fortitude, at length assumes the form, and is viewed in the light of a fair perquisite of office. In this manner abuses multiply, and the ingenuity of man is ever fertile in finding some palliative. Custom and example sanction the greatest enormaties which at length become fortified by immemorial and progressive usage: it is no wonder, therfore, that the superior Officers find it an Herculean labour to cleanse the Augean stable.

The relations of appropriation give to labour a unity that is apprehended according to various capitalist interests. We can distinguish three. First, are the technologists, like Samuel Bentham or William Vaughan, who see the working class as the producers of things, because they wish to increase productivity by revolutionizing the tools of labour. Second, are the economists, like Adam Smith or David Ricardo, to whom the working class is a quantitative aspect of capital, the producers of a value according to the duration of their labour. Third, are the police, like Colquhoun and Harriott, who see the working class as the producers of idleness, drunkeness and disorder. Customary appropriations appear as inefficiency or waste to the technologists, as an inventory loss or transaction cost to the economists, and a depredation or crime to the police. They therefore wage war against the working class.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • blogmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

The Bush and Blair Corporation

Wednesday, September 27th, 2006

The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), or perhaps more aptly, the Bush and Blair Corporation, (a term coined by George Galloway in relation to the BBC's biased news reporting and, I believe, its political agenda), goes from bad to worse. Apparently they're still a public service broadcaster, paid for mainly by us license fee payers, yet they promote commercial interests which are not in the public interest.

I can't load the BBC News Player, they tell me that it is "probably because you have JavaScript turned off", then tell me how to enable it on Windows or Mac. They offer a podcast of the news. In their news headlines that tick across the top of the screen I am informed, "LATEST: Microsoft releases patch for bug in Internet Explorer two weeks early", as if that really is news. If I want to watch a video from their site I'm offered a choice of windows media player or real player.

Who are these fools?

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • blogmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

TheaurauJohn : A Name, Not The Thing

Saturday, July 29th, 2006
There is a name and a thing, and a thing, And a name, And a name, And not the thing, And the Name and the thing both in accordance to the thing and name.
from The Nations Right in Magna Charta discussed with the thing Called Parliament. [Dec 1650]

Seal of TheaurauJohn Thomas Tany

I have come to set all things out of joynt

Thomas Tany, (also known as Theauraujohn Tani, John Tany, Thomas Totni, Theaurau-John Tanniour, John Tawney, John Tanny, Theaura John, Theauro John, Tom Tottey, …), a London goldsmith, is known to have had 15 works published between 1650 and 1655, varying from single sheet broadsides to works of up to 100 pages.

On the 23rd of November, 1649, after several weeks of fasting and prayer, Thomas Totney entered into a trance and the Voice of God spoke to him. It was revealed to him that he was the High-Priest of the Jews and that his task was to ensure the safe return of all Jews to Israel. At this same time he was also given the name TheaurauJohn Tany. His mission was publicly declared in April of 1650 with the publication of I PROCLAIME From the Lord of HOSTS, printed by Charles Sumptner for Giles Calvert, and sold at the Black-spread-Eagle at the West-end of [St] Paules, London, which he signed, 'THEAURAUJOHN TANY Gold-smith'.

Tany states, in Theauraujohn his Aurora in Translagorum in Salem Gloria or, The discussive of the Law and the Gospell betwixt the Jew and the Gentile in Salem Resurrectionem (1651), "…though I was unlearned, all languages under heaven I had given me in seven days space. … when I write I have no knowledge, neither behind nor before, but the word that comes…" The publication of this work saw him, (and Captain Robert Norwood, member of the High Court of Justice, who wrote the preface), charged with Blasphemy and subsequently convicted and sentenced to 6 months in Newgate gaol.

Before this sentencing was carried out, Tany published Theous Ori Apolipikal or, God's Light Declared in Mysteries (1651), in the final pages of which is found My ANSWER Added to the CHARGE against ME, where Tany refutes each of the charges brought against him. "Through the great Calumny of aspersion laid upon me, I am forced to publish to the world what I have declared…"

1 They charge me with A dissoluteness in living, and breaking all humane society
…I desire you to search my life in actions thorowly, and I shall prove unto you a Looking-glass, whereby you may discern your own spots and foulness, and wilful failings…
2 The second Charge is, That I deny Gospel-Ordinances
To which I Answer, That I do not nor cannot… your Gospel lies in your head by parrat-learning … not in your hearts, writ by the finger of God; for if it were, persecution would cease, and acts of mercy would flow, and deceit vanish …
3 The third was, That I said, That the Bible was a riddle
…is it not a riddle, a mystery, a Microcosm to the world; nay to you? … But ye cry the name of the Gospel high, but you are a Gospel to your self-ends, for the truth in the Gospel is doing deeds of mercy, and not in disputing names of dead letters…
4 The fourth is, that I should say That there is no such thing as Hell, as your Ministers hold forth
…Hell is a separation from enjoyment…
9 That I said the New-Testament is a lye
…and I say, It is but a name of dead letters set together with much intervention: and more, many places translated to hold up the Pope and Clergecies supremacie, and burdening the people to their tyranny…
12 They say that I said, that God was not forever
Which I protest I have never spoken … Now I say before all men, you my accusers are blasphemers, and I am not; but rage not, I can pass it by…

Tany served his prison sentence in full, and was released in February 1652, returning to Eltham.

March 1652 saw the publication of Tany's THEAVRAUIOHN High Priest to the IEVVES, HIS Disputive Challenge to the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, and the whole Hirach. of Roms Clargical Priests, ("I am in prison at the writing hereof"), in which he sets a day, "the fifth day of April 1652", and a place, "Saint Pauls, that old called Church, but now the new made Stable", where he will give a "demonstration of the glorious clothing wherewith my God hath clothed me", challenging "the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, as also the dessembling, deceived, and deceiving Clergie," and "the whole Hirarchie of Rome … And if you dare not appear to despute, then know, I take your silence to consent to my affirmation … then know ye, that you are Liars, Cheaters, and Deceivers, and dare not come to the Light." A margin note declares, "If the States, or men, or man, would hear of me, I live at Eltham but at M. Giles Calvert at the Black spred-Eagle, at the West end of Saint Pauls church there you may be directed to my lodging, for know all people that I turn my face from no man upon Earth."

When the day came he found the door locked and that none of the invited were there to meet him. In THEAVRAUIOHN HIS EPITAH And EVROPS Looking-glass, (April 1652), he writes, "Now all people, wheras I wrote an Epistle in which I challenged the lying Clergy of England, upon the 5 of April in Pauls Church, offering a fair dispute unto them, at which place, I was in the morning, and put up my bill signifying to appear at three of the clock that day, in the meantime the seduced spirits had obtained strength and power, to shut the doors and keep the people out, so when I came the doors was shut…"

In May, 1654, now residing in a tent pitched in Eltham, Tany published the broadside, Hear O Earth, wherein is said, "The Heavens have given Fire to lighten the Cabbafl in man; and a voice from that Enlightenedment shall be declared from the Lords Tent, standing in the bounds of Eltham, called by name, The middle Park … And in the Lords Tent is the Creation vivificated, in colour, manner, and matter, and to be viewed by any one, until the end of the days of Dedication."

Later that same year, in December, Tany, now living in Lambeth, created a bonfire outside his tent; on this fire, in front of a crowd of people that had gathered, he burnt a sword, a saddle, a pair of pistols, and the Bible, declaring them to be the four great Idols of England. He then, with his accomplice, Rowle Tichburne, made his way by boat to the House of Commons, dressed in old armour and equipped with a rusty sword, declaring that he was going to murder those present in the House.

He entered the lobby of the House and asked the door-keeper whether he might deliver a petition. The door-keeper informed him that this may be possible if any Member of the House would give his endorsement. Tany then retired for an hour, after which he returned, with Rowle Tichburne, both armed with swords, and paced up and down in the Lobby for fifteen minutes. He then suddenly charged at the door-keeper, who, along with almost all of those present in the lobby, ran from the room. Major Christopher Ennis remained in the lobby and a scuffle between Tany and Ennis ensued, ending in Tany forcing his way into the Chamber. Inevitably, this resulted in Tany being imprisoned in the Gate-House.

The event was recorded in broadsides of the day:

The Faithful Scout, No. 208, 29 December – 5 January, 1654/5 reported…

Saturday Dec. 29
This day a hair brained Gentleman, one Theaurau John Tanior, who calls himself the High-priest of the Jewes, and useth sometimes to live in Tents, which he erects at Lambeth and Greenwich, saying He is to gather the dispierced Jews, and carry them to the Holy-Land, came in an antique habit, with a long rusty sword by his side to the Lobby at the Parl house door, where he suddenly fell a slashing of the people, and with his sword drawn ran at Cooper the Door-keeper, and put him, and the rest of to the Run, cleering the Room of all persons, except Major Ennis, who closed in with him, and struck up his heels; yet he recovered himself again, and ran with his sword drawn, and bounced with his foot at the house door, and turned the key with his hand, and opened the door; Then Maj. Ennis fell into him again, and disarmed him. Whereupon he was sent for in, and coming to the bar he stood covered; but the Sergeant was commanded to take off his hat; He was there asked divers questions, to which he answered notably; and being afterwards examined by a Committee, he declared, That he came inspired by the Holy Spirit, to kill every man that sat in the house, and was resolved thereupon. And after some time spent in examination, he was committed to the Gate-house, in order to his further Tryal. But note, that even before he came from Lambeth, to act this Assassination at Westminster, with great solemnity he burnt a sword, a geat saddle, a pair of pistols, and the Bible together, declaring them the three grand Idols of England. This is the fruit of the phrensie, called Quakerism.

Certain Passages of Every Dayes Intelligence, No. 74, 20 December – 5 January, 1654/5 reported…

Tuesday January 4
John Tawney, alis Theoreau John (of whom mention is made before) was examined before a Committee, since his commitment to the Gatehouse, and divers Witnesses concerning his carriage examined, and it appeared that he cut & slasht with a rusty sword in the Lobby, but he did not much hurt.

2. That when he was called to the Bar of the House, he stood with his hat on til the Serjeant took it off.
3. That when he came in this manner to the House door, he said that he was inspired by the Holy Ghost to kill every man that sat in the House.
4. That he had formerly been committed to Newgate for Blasphemy.
5. That last week at Lambeth with great solemnity he openly burnt the Bible, a great saddle, and a pair of pistols together, and openly declared that they were the three grand Idols of England.
6. He professeth himselfe to be no Schollar, yet have set forth several things in print, wherein he takes on him the most accurate knowledge of Hebrew, and saith it came to him by Revelation, in one of his Quaking trances.
7. He saith that his Office is to gather the dispersed Jews (sprung out of the Gentiles) in England, and that there be more like unto himselfe designed for other places.

Some of which were more slanderous than others:

Mercurius Fumigosus, No. 32, 3-10 January, 1655 reported…

A Plott, A Plott, old Nick is dead,
John Tawney did him kill,
With rusty sword he hack'd his head,
but sore against his will.

Theorau John, one of the inspired Cyclops of Vulcans Forge, being a mad Transylvanian, that had the Hebrew reveal'd to him in a Quaking fitt

He drew, and put it up again, like a great Booby

A two-legg'd beast, called a Slutt, last week having her leaven devoured by the Rats, and fearing her Mistris would be angry with her, surreverence dropt a little into her Kneading-trough of her own making, which made her bread so sowre and crabbed, that no Milk-woman dares passe by their door without having all their milk turned into Chees-curds, no knife that cutts this bread, but is sent the next Day to the Grinders, no edge can be set thereon ever after; the women are afraid to lie with their Husbands for fear of begetting Children with Crab-tree Faces: the Maide that committed this Piece of Huswifery is next week to be Circumcised by Black Madge of the Beare-garden, and so be gathered into Theoreau Johns flock of Converted Jews, and to be Cook Russian to the Pharisees, as they are conducted by John Robbins through the Red Sea, to the Iland in the Moon, to recollect their scences, which were lost a fort-after Midsummer come Twelve Month.

Whilst imprisoned at the Gatehouse Tany has a large lock and chain attached to his leg as a metephor for the captivity of the people of England. He was released on bail in February 1655, following a petition to the upper bench protesting wrongful imprisonment, habeas corpus.

In April 1655 Tany published THARAM TANIAH, Leader of the Lords Hosts, Unto his brethren the QUAKERS, scornfully so called… a broadside, aimed at his followers, instructing them that Tany's mission, to deliver the captive Jews to Jerusalem, is still very much in his plans, and declaring, These things the Heathen dogs know not.

In August Tany published My EDICT Royal, his last extant work, wherein he gives his account of the burning of the three Idols of England and what transcended at the House of Commons. "…Now I shall declare unto the whole earth the cause both of my burning and breaking my Sword, Pistols, and Musket, and the spoiling of the Barrel of Powder, as also the burning of the Bible termed the Word of GOD by ignorants, not knowing GOD. … Therefore all People, Tongues and Nations, Know, That I did not burn the BIBLE in contempt of GOD, or in contempt of its Record from GOD … I say, the Word of GOD cannot be burned, for it's GOD's righteousness in my Soul planted, and unto Men by my life declared in these Words, Sell all that you have, and give unto the poor, and follow me. … Thus saith GOD, the dogs and toads are that you count the basest in the Creation, is cleaner than all men and women under heaven; for they act only for life, an dye for your abominable lusts…

"…Three days before I came down to the House, the name I know not by reason of its Catastrophe, ing, ing, ing, thus my body fainted, and my spirit in me retained scare strength to move my frame, & then my teeth beat in my head as the fiercest ague that ever fell on man, my knees smote together, my hands quaked, and my water fell from me, for the presense of God was terrible unto me; then came the word of Jehovah, and said unto me, go down and slay the rebels against me, and make sharp thy sword, for they have broken the Covenants. … Then the Lord commanded to burn his Tent onely save the Tent staff, and burn the priests garments, with all that I had; whereupon I began to burn many things, and my own books, for all books do but image the life of some thing from the life expressing the true thing, and are dead idols when you come to dy, what good can all the written books in the whole world do you, they are but dead letters…

"…now when I had done burning, the people did rage so, that I was fain to go to boat with my sword drawn, and one Rowle Tichburn with me, and I borrowed an old sword for him to have in his hand, but he knew nothing at all, onely my safety from the people that did stone us in the boat, and I cannot go without a gard by reason of the heathen rage …

"…and I came into the Loby, and spake to Master Hull, that he would help me deliver [my petition], but I must give it to a Member, and I said I know no men their … Then I went … and had two mess of broth and two pots of Ale for Tichburn and my self, and then I was commanded by Jehovah, for to go, and comming to the door, the door-keeper of the Loby pressed me betwixt the door and the wall, whereupon I came in the sliped of my cloak, and drew my sword, and ran at him so hard, that the people came within a foot of the hand, and would not enter, then I swange my sword round about to have killed all that was nigh me; then I run to the door and struck it with my foot, and then they gat hold of me, and threw me down and took away my sword…

"Now all people see your liberty by my president amongst wicked men your lord rulers, by their own unjust laws: they sent for me to examine me before a Committee, and some friends were at prison, and went along with me, but because of their wickedness, they are fearful of every winde, and according to their wills, establish for our English laws; no man must hear me examined, but one or two pressed in. The first queries were frivolus, as where I lived, and had I not been at Rome, and my clothes did trouble them, and they asked who gave me money for my clothes, I answered by their asking that question they were free from charity, for they were to clothe the naked and feed the hungry. Then they did ask why were my sleeves so laced, I said it was the Glob in the four Spheres holdment, and I told them that they were no wiser than before…

"The next and last was this, I did beseech and consider that a man of peace, a man that had forsaken all, that God should raise him up to testifie with the hazard of his life, God's fierce wrath kindled against them, to cut them off quite from the earth. Then one answered and said, I fought with Colonel Rich; then I said, Gentlemen I beseech you all to hear me in this matter, then they heard me attentively, then I said, that when Colonel Rich and Captain French that villiain, with the rest of the theeves came to divide their theevish purchases, the Parks, in which they had cheated the poor souldiers, by buying their debentures for a song in comparison of their due right, for Gentlemen, I said, thus, if I set a man to work till it comes unto twenty shillings, and then give him ten groats, I count them cheating theeves and villains. What do you think of this?? At this word they were mute, and asked me what I was, and if I loved the Quakers, and I said that they were honest men, if they were but what they said, but for to speak good words, and under them good pretences wrong and spoil others, them my soul did abhor and loath…"

In September 1655, Tany was involved in a dispute over land rights in St George's Fields, where he had pitched his tent, which involved assaults on himself and his belongings. He reputedly issued a broadside, Take Notice All People, warning people off the "ground I hyre", which was published verbatim within an article in Mercurius Fumigosis, No. 70, 11 September – 3 October, 1655.

There were no further publications by Tany after this point in time. It is believed that he made himself a boat and set sail for Holland, continuing his mission of gathering the dispersed Jews, only to be shipwrecked on the journey and drown.

The meaning of the name

"…Now minde, The, is from the Greek word Theos; now The stands before in my name given by God, which is to say the eye, or Gods eye; discovering the light, in the hidden mysterious mystery of John." (Epistle VII, Theous Ori Apolipikal or, God's Light Declared in Mysteries, 1651). "…the import of my name, which is thus, Theauraujohn, that is, God his declarer in the morning, the peaceful tidings of good things. … Scholars, you know Theus, then Aurau, you know them two names, and John is the beloved Dove…" (Epistle 12, Wrote at Eltham, but the intendant of the delivery of this Epistle was at Saint Pauls Church, Theous Ori Apolipikal, Part Two, 1653).

What I have written, I have written

Further reading:
TheaurauJohn Speaks! The Collected Work Of Thomas Tany
Edited by Jarett Kobek. Resurrectionary Press, Providence, RI., 2003

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • blogmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Frans Masereel : Passionate Journey

Sunday, June 11th, 2006
Pages from Passionate Journey I first chanced upon the work of Frans Masereel (1889-1972) some 20 years ago, a copy of Passionate Journey (1919), a wordless, graphic novel in 165 woodcuts, published by Subterráneo Press, and I still find it an inspiring read. Highly recommended.

Graphic Witness, a site dedicated to social commentary through graphic imagery, have made available 2 complete publications from Masereel: Die Stadt (The City) (1925), and Landschaften und Stimmungen (Landscapes and Voices) (1929).

On the left I have reproduced a selection of pages from Passionate Journey, without giving away too much of the story.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • blogmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Nuclear Power? No Thanks

Tuesday, May 16th, 2006
Nuclear Power No Thanks

Blair backs nuclear power plans

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • blogmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Down With The Monarchy!

Thursday, April 20th, 2006
It is the Queen's 80th birthday tomorrow, the media like to keep reminding us, with a disgustingly high level of sycophancy and fawning, giving it far too much coverage. They would have us believe that the whole country is going to rise tomorrow morning and wish the Queen a happy birthday. I heard someone on the radio say, 'Even anti-royalists find it hard to criticise the Queen,' as if, somehow, the Queen is regarded differently from the other royals. What rubbish! The end of the monarchy can't come soon enough.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • blogmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Richard Stallman speaks on GPLv3

Tuesday, April 4th, 2006

The transcript of Richard Stallman's talk on GPLv3 in Torino, 18th March 2006, is reproduced on the FSF Europe website. If you've been following the emergence of GPLv3, the topics that are covered will not surprise you. The question and answer sequence is interesting as the dialogue is less dry and Stallman's didactic approach becomes more visible. A member of the audience puts forward a question but is unable to finish, "…do you think the fight against Digital Rights Managements and Trusted Comp…", "Digital Restrictions Management, and Treacherous Computing", interrupts Stallman, "Don't use the enemy's propaganda terms, every time you use those terms you are supporting the enemy". I like that. It also brings to mind his comments on the term intellectual property at the top of the talk. Stallman then tells it how it is: "…governments mostly are not very democratic anymore. They mostly are the pro-consuls of the mega corporations, their job is to keep us in line under the rule of the empire. That's why they run for office, they get into office, they do what the emperor — the emperor being the mega corporations — tells them to do, and their job is explaining to us why they can't do what we want them to do. It's very very sad and once in a while somebody has enough courage to refuse to obey, somebody like [sounds like Hugo Chavez]." In the absense of a democratic government, Stallman goes on to give some sound consumer advice on the purchase of DVDs: "If you can't copy it – don't buy it!" There's no need to confuse the issue. He is then questioned about the fact that it is he alone who decides what modifications of the licence will be done, he replies, (rather suspectly in my opinion, but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt), "I don't know other people who can do this", but expresses the hope "that the process that's going on now will help develop people who can be part of some group activity". I think he's kept it true so far, and I hope, I believe, he will continue to do so.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • blogmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Twitter